Interviewer:
And what about Buddhism? Is it also a very dangerous and anti-Christian phenomenon?
Father Daniil Sysoev:
Buddhism is an ideology of death, an ideology of spiritual death. The idea of Buddhism proceeds from the notion that it is normal for a person to disappear altogether. "Life is suffering," as Buddha said, "get rid of desire – get rid of suffering." That is, actually, you cannot end suffering by ending yourself; you need to destroy the personality so that it is not reborn again at birth – this is the ideology of spiritual death.
It is also indicative that Buddhism is disposed to negotiate with demons. On this point, there was an interesting reflection by Saint Nikolai (Velimirovich) of Serbia: "Christ, unlike all known leaders of humanity, did not negotiate with demons. The conversation was short – 'Get out. Don't come anywhere near here.'" Right.
Muhammad, on the other hand, conversed with a jinn, according to the official biography of Muhammad. Buddha did not negotiate with Mara, but later Buddhist monks used evil spirits to spread Buddhism. That is, it is precisely thanks to Buddhism that the most backward and unclean pagan practices, which were eradicated everywhere in the world by Christianity, have been preserved. Buddhism is a reserve of the second death, a terrible ideology of the second death. And, of course, it is a huge spiritual threat to the whole world.
Interviewer:
Yes, because, excuse me, often some foolish people think that Buddhism is such a tolerant ideology, that there are such peaceful people there, but, as they say, still waters run deep...
Father Daniil Sysoev:
Well, again, what does "peaceful people" mean? Let's remember that King Ashoka (Indian emperor – great patron of Buddhism) slaughtered an entire people. There's not much peace there. There were terrible internecine conflicts perpetrated by Buddhists. Even within the Buddhist Sangha (Buddhist spiritual practice or school), there were terrible massacres. Take, for example, the Red Hats and the Yellow Hats, the same ones. (During wars, mass atrocities committed by Buddhists occurred. For example, during the war with the Uyghur Muslims, the Dzungar commander Galdan Bodohchu, upon capturing a city, cut off the heads of 8,000 Muslims for refusing to convert to Buddhism. Besides the war with the Bon religion, the "most peaceful religion in the world" also distinguished itself in Tibet with a war against its co-religionists. The main struggle unfolded between the Yellow Hats of the Gelugpa and the Red Hats of the Karmapa. In 1642, nomadic tribes, which the Yellow Hats had won over to their side, defeated the Karmapa's forces and transferred power over Tibet to the 5th Dalai Lama, nicknamed the "Great Fifth.") Let us recall even in Russian history Baron Ungern, who was a Buddhist. What monstrous atrocities he committed, the most brutal. (- Cruel punishments for soldiers' infractions. For the slightest infractions, soldiers were beaten with bamboo sticks or executed. For example, Ensign Chernov was burned alive by Ungern.; - On September 15, 1921, by the verdict of a Soviet court, Ungern was executed. He was accused of armed struggle against Soviet power, reprisals against the local population, and mass murders.) Again, in the ritual practice of Buddhism, human sacrifice lies, in elite mystical Buddhism, so to speak. Although, of course, Buddha did not profess this, but Buddhism preserved all the black practices of paganism. Again, Buddhism perpetrated terrible persecutions of Christians. Remember the persecution of Christians in Japan, when more than 100 thousand people were killed specifically by Buddhists.
Interviewer:
In China, too.
Father Daniil Sysoev:
There were persecutions in China as well.
Interviewer:
And in Vietnam, it happened.
Father Daniil Sysoev:
Yes, Vietnam, China, Japan, Kalmykia, Mongolia, naturally. That is, all these Buddhist peoples are also distinguished by this certain cruelty. Again, this is connected not with the national character, but with the fact that a person is not protected from the action of evil spirits, and therefore he cannot cope with them. The same history is connected with questions: "Why are Muslims in general so aggressive? Why are there such brutal killers specifically in Islam?" This is not because Muslims are bastards, they are not bastards, but it is connected with the fact that they cannot cope with that evil force that attacks them. That is, these people are without protection from the power of darkness. Unfortunately, often when we discuss religious issues, for some reason we talk as if it's about relations between people.
They say: "You need to come to an agreement with Muslims."
Well, maybe you can come to an agreement with Muslims, but can you come to an agreement with evil spirits? It won't work. Do you understand?
You can come to an agreement with the communists, right? But can you come to an agreement with satan standing behind them? That won't work either. Do you understand? This is what is forgotten. Religion is the establishment of a connection. There is a connection. Any religion necessarily establishes a connection with someone. When they say that sects exist only for profit. There are sects for profit, but they usually exist for about 5-10 years. Well, obviously, you gather money and go live for your own pleasure; why would you need to maintain it further? Any religious concept that exists for any length of time necessarily presupposes some kind of contact with the spiritual world. That's how it all is determined.
Regarding the tolerance of Buddhism. In reality, they persecuted pagans, they persecuted Christianity, and they persecuted Islam. And here, tolerance is only theoretical, but in practice it doesn't exist. This, actually, is impossible anywhere. True tolerance is possible only when people have no contact with the spiritual world. True tolerance cannot exist in Christians, because a Christian will not tolerate evil; he will tolerate a person, he will tolerate a mistaken person, but he will never come to terms with the evil that grips a person. That is, in this sense, he too will be an intolerant person. The tolerance of a person gripped by evil can exist towards another form of lies, but he will never be tolerant of the Truth, because the Truth will destroy the whole edifice of lies like a house of cards. Do you understand, like a house of cards? Here, therefore, such a person will also not achieve tolerance. It is impossible; it is an illusory attempt to build some kind of peace between people based on a contract. It is an artificial attempt. Tolerance is such a spiritual disease, like spiritual AIDS, so to speak.
No comments:
Post a Comment